翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Jacksons Lake (Lennox and Addington County) ・ Jacksons Landing ・ Jacksons Lane ・ Jacksons Mill Covered Bridge (Bedford County, Pennsylvania) ・ Jacksons of Piccadilly ・ Jacksons Point, Nova Scotia ・ Jacksons Stores ・ Jacksons, British Columbia ・ Jacksons, New Zealand ・ Jackson United ・ Jackson University ・ Jackson v A-G ・ Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd ・ Jackson v Royal Bank of Scotland ・ Jackson v Union Marine Insurance ・ Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education ・ Jackson v. Bishop ・ Jackson v. Indiana ・ Jackson v. Jackson ・ Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. ・ Jackson Vahue ・ Jackson Valoy ・ Jackson Volcano ・ Jackson Vroman ・ Jackson W. Moore ・ Jackson Walsh ・ Jackson Wang ・ Jackson Ward ・ Jackson Waters ・ Jackson Weaver Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education ： ウィキペディア英語版 Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education ''Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education'', , is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that retaliation against a person because that person has complained of sex discrimination is a form of intentional sex discrimination encompassed by Title IX. == Background == Roderick Jackson, a teacher in the Birmingham, Alabama, public school system, brought suit against the Birmingham Board of Education alleging that the board retaliated against him because he complained about sex discrimination at Ensley High School. Jackson, who had taught for six years prior in the Birmingham school district, was transferred to Ensley High School in August 1999 as a physical education teacher and girl's basketball coach. Jackson discovered that Ensley High School did not provide equal funding and access to athletic equipment and facilities for the girls' teams. In December 2000, Jackson began complaining of the unequal treatment, and began receiving negative evaluations. Jackson was removed as the girls' basketball coach in May 2001.〔http://oyez.com/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_02_1672〕 The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama dismissed Jackson's claims on the grounds that Title IX's private right of action does not include claims of retaliation. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court holding that Title IX does not provide a private right of action for retaliation.〔Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed., 309 F.3d 1333 (2002).〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.